<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
	<channel>
		<title>SolusLabs Forum - SolusVM Bug Reports</title>
		<link>http://forum.soluslabs.com/</link>
		<description>Temporary Bug Report Forum</description>
		<language>en</language>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 17:01:01 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>vBulletin</generator>
		<ttl>60</ttl>
		
		<item>
			<title>solusvm uid</title>
			<link>http://forum.soluslabs.com/showthread.php/5094-solusvm-uid?goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 18:18:28 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>We attach our SolusVM nodes to our LDAP instance, for central management of usernames, passwords, SSH keys, and so on. 
 
The SolusVM installer takes...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>We attach our SolusVM nodes to our LDAP instance, for central management of usernames, passwords, SSH keys, and so on.<br />
<br />
The SolusVM installer takes the &quot;next available UID and GID&quot; for the solusvm user. But it checks that number from the LDAP database. As the LDAP database constantly changes, this means that the locally-created UID/GID conflicts with something in LDAP.<br />
<br />
I can see lots of ways to adjust the current behavior. Perhaps a fixed UID/GID for solusvm, or a statement that the solusvm user should exist in LDAP before installing solusvm. But the current situation of &quot;grab the next uid&quot; just doesn't seem correct.<br />
<br />
For others in this situation you can set a fixed uid and gid in /etc/passwd and /etc/group, then find &amp; chown the files. But it seems the installer should have a better way of handling this.</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://forum.soluslabs.com/forumdisplay.php/43-SolusVM-Bug-Reports">SolusVM Bug Reports</category>
			<dc:creator>mwlucas</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://forum.soluslabs.com/showthread.php/5094-solusvm-uid</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>API incorrectly showing memory usage when swap active</title>
			<link>http://forum.soluslabs.com/showthread.php/5085-API-incorrectly-showing-memory-usage-when-swap-active?goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 22:24:13 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Greetings, 
 
On two of my servers I have swap active. As you can see by below screen shots the api totally messes up the memory reported usage 
...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Greetings,<br />
<br />
On two of my servers I have swap active. As you can see by below screen shots the api totally messes up the memory reported usage<br />
<br />
<a href="http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/585/attachment72.jpg/" target="_blank"><img src="http://imageshack.us/scaled/medium/585/attachment72.jpg" border="0" alt="" /></a><br />
<a href="http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/199/solus.png/" target="_blank"><img src="http://imageshack.us/scaled/medium/199/solus.png" border="0" alt="" /></a><br />
<a href="http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/837/attachment62.jpg/" target="_blank"><img src="http://imageshack.us/scaled/medium/837/attachment62.jpg" border="0" alt="" /></a><br />
<a href="http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/825/attachment55.jpg/" target="_blank"><img src="http://imageshack.us/scaled/medium/825/attachment55.jpg" border="0" alt="" /></a></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://forum.soluslabs.com/forumdisplay.php/43-SolusVM-Bug-Reports">SolusVM Bug Reports</category>
			<dc:creator>Cybehrost</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://forum.soluslabs.com/showthread.php/5085-API-incorrectly-showing-memory-usage-when-swap-active</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
